Moses works and saves Venice


The days when Venice fought the tide with its bare hands and lived with the nightmare of waking up with water in its throat are now archived. And today, in addition to the lion of San Marco, there is a new symbol, or rather a symbolic work, that makes Italy the talk of the world. The stress test that Moses underwent three days ago is the stress test you can imagine. Meteorologists say that without the bulkhead system of the Electromechanical Experimental Module, the Serenissima would have experienced the worst day in its history due to an unprecedented flood. Suffice it to say that in 2019 a very similar event caused damage of over 150 million euros.

The slap to the critics is a resounding one. The story of Moses is a story that is a practical demonstration and a great showcase of our country’s technological potential. It was May 14, 2003 when Silvio Berlusconi, his main sponsor, welcomed “a fundamental work for Venice” and laid the first stone with a parchment commemorating the ceremony, which was then placed at the bottom of the Malamocco Canal.

The Cavaliere defended this work vigorously and several times over time. “The work has started and will not be stopped, the work has been decided,” said the Prime Minister at the end of the Venice Committee meeting in 2005. The Prodi government then decided to confirm the infrastructure in 2006, but had to reckon with the Opposition of Mayor Massimo Cacciari and Environment Minister Pecoraro Scanio.

Cacciari never gave up this dislike over time. And in 2021 he dared again: “Moses is a wrong project. It was known, we in the church had put it in writing, they didn’t listen to us. In a few years we may go fishing on the Moselle». A few years earlier, it was Alessandra Moretti who ventured into this field and published a post on social media with a (fake) photo: “The photo shows Galan and Zaia, who are happy about the launch of Moses,” she wrote , «the project it was born with the Berlusconi government. The dam is a rust cathedral beneath the lagoon». It is a pity that Luca Zaia was President of the Province of Treviso in 2003 and was not present at the inauguration of the plant. The Cinquestelle, which in 2015 asked for a complete revision of the Moses project “as proposed by MP Federico D’Incà”, also vehemently rejected the work. In short, the opera had to withstand the headwinds, the delays, the episodes of corruption, the cassandras and the refrains that have always accompanied any new major public opera in Italy. And with a paradoxical result, Romeo Chiarotto’s Nuova Venezia disappeared over time, as did Duccio Astaldi and Isabella Bruno’s Grandi Lavori Fincosit e Condotte, who – as Giuseppe Marino recalled on these columns – had the merit of building the mobile dam, ie part more complex than work. A technical marvel that the world envies us for today and that gave the Venetians the privilege of normality.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *