All Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 benchmarks


The Snapdragon 2022 Summit ended last week but we still have something to tell you about the new Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 or SoC excellent of the company for the end of 2022 and a large part of 2023.

We have already told you what all the new features it includes and what its technical specifications are. Today we are talking about Standards. Although these are certainly not quite an illustrative measure of a product, there is no doubt that they still have a certain importance, provided they are analyzed with due consideration.

Benchmarks cannot yet assess every aspect of a SoC which by definition is a collection of very different components that affect aspects that cannot be measured by a standard, such as imaging quality or system fluidity.

With that said, let’s look at the benchmark results taken as an average of three iterations. Obviously, the tester is a product without a particular design or battery life limitation, even if it is intended to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 It is also and above all to improve energy performance.

  • AnTuTu: 1,280,000
  • GeekBench Single Core: 1495
  • Geekbench is multi-core: 5200
  • GFX Aztec Vulkan 1440p seat off screen: 65 fps
  • GFX 1080p Manhattan 3.0 off screen: 332 fps
  • Jet: 170
  • Speedometer: 146
  • Image classification MLPerf: 3920
  • MLPerf Image Rating Offline: 5020
  • Discover the MLPerf object: 1800
  • MLPerf image segmentation: 950
  • Understanding of the MLPerf language: 185
  • PCMark: 18900

The data is more interesting when compared to the same device from last year with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1.

  • Antoto: +30%
  • GeekBench Single Core: +21%
  • GeekBench is multi-core: + 36%
  • GFX Aztec Vulkan Seat 1440p: + 32%
  • Image classification MLPerf: +60%
  • Discover the MLPerf object: +44%

They’re really impressive differences, not only on the AI ​​side (where every year the difference is often huge), but also on the CPU where last year’s increases were minuscule. Choose to bring the cores to four performance Compared to the three from the previous year, it may have been more successful.

To date, there are no approved tests to verify ray tracing. The only installable file (GravityMark) did not deliver the expected results with fps Almost in half compared to a smartphone with only ray tracing software.

For this reason, at the present time, we tend not to consider this test reliable and expect new updated standards in the coming months.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *